Tanzanian GDP is 28 per cent larger- sources
THE TANZANIAN economy is larger than
previously estimated, we can authoritatively report. The rebasing exercise,
whose results are yet to be released, found that the economy was more than
27 per cent larger by the close of 2013.
Two weeks ago, this publication estimated Tanzania’s
GDP to be higher than US$33 billion previously estimated. Now the actual size
has been found to be almost 28 per cent higher. This puts the GDP at the end of
last year to US$42.51 billion at the January’s exchange rate.
Re-basing of the national account series (which
includes the GDP) is the process of replacing an old base year with a new and
more recent base year. The base year provides the reference point to which
future values of the GDP are compared.
Re-basing is meant to reflect recent developments in the
economy and expand the basket of consumer goods to reflect changing tastes and
preferences. Consequently, countries re-base their economy once in a decade
although the UN recommends that re-basing be done every five years.
The structure of the Tanzania has changed dramatically since
2001 with new industries coming up especially in the mining sector. The
services sector has also posted tremendous, discernible growth with the
telecommunications sectors growing from an estimated 500,000 telephone lines in
2001 to nearly 28 million as at the end of March 2014.
In 2001 internet communication was through cyber cafes
and was expensive. To date internet is available on the majority of handsets.
There was no mobile money transfer then, now it is diffuse.
Although there were some LNG resources at Sonko sonko, they
were not fully exploited and the quantity of LNG available in Tanzania is
estimated at 53tcf.
Concomitant with the elevation of GDP will be the rise in
GDP per capita which will see the country move closer to achieving its target
of being a middle income economy by 2020. Estimates based on the 2012 census
place the population of Tanzania at 47 million. This works to a GDP per capita
$904 compared to $708 in the current estimates.
What are the
implications of a larger GDP? Several
things come to mind. Among these is that Tanzania has to take a hard look at
her taxation policy. According to the
current budget estimates, domestic revenue was expected generate US$7.4
billion, that is 65 per cent of the US$12 billion national budget estimates.
Going by the same rates, that is 22.3 per cent of the lower GDP, then Tanzania
should raise some US$9.46 billion from domestic revenue which is 79 per cent of
the budget. In fact, Tanzania which is currently suffering withdrawal of donor
support, can comfortably bridge the gap from domestic taxes.
The new larger economy means that Tanzania must start
thinking big and invest big to support the larger economy. She has to start investing in infrastructure,
especially transport in order to support increased economic activity. Top on
the agenda should be investment on the central corridor.
A report by the Africa Development Bank shows
that the central corridor is scantly used due to the fact that much of it is
not paved.
Consequently, average annual daily traffic on large sections
of this corridor is less than 1000 vehicles only 40 per cent of the corridor
boasts of an AADT of more than 1000 vehicles. This compares negatively with the traffic
population on the Northern Corridor where AADT is 3000.
The implication is that investment is needed on this
corridor to make it a viable route. And now that Tanzania is investing in
Bagamoyo Port, Investment in roads and Highways is urgent. Without these,
investment in Bagamoyo port will be a white elephant.
With the rebased GDP, we expected the quarterly and annual
growth rates to change. Economists say they will not be surprised if Tanzania
has been posting double digit growth for a while now. A larger economy demands
lots of support investments to keep it growing. Among these is the nation debt
–GDP ratio.
The national debt to GDP ratio which by end of April
stood at US$17.853, say the Central Bank of Tanzania. At the old
estimates this amount of debt was the equivalent of 53 per cent of GDP.
Comments
Post a Comment