What Next for Kenya's telecoms industry?
1990s: Fixed line telecoms frustrated Kenyans who embraced Mobile telephony with a religious zeal |
There are 30 million subscribers in a country
of 42 million people, meaning there are more mobile phone handsets than there
are adults. The result is a slowdown in
growth of mobile penetration, which now hovers around 2.7 per cent quarter –on-
quarter. This is not surprising as the telephone penetration rate now is 78 per
cent, further dimming the prospects for future vertical growth in Kenya.
2013: This market is now saturated. What next for telecoms sector? |
Vertical expansion is the acquisition
of new customers thus expanding a company’s market share. In the early years of
the last decade, this growth was rapid for there was latent demand for
telecommunications services. That is no more. The days of growth rates above
near 10 per cent quarter- on-quarter are gone.
Now growth is down to one per cent q-o-q,
says the industry regulator, CCK, in quarterly report for the second quarter of
2012/2013.
That Mobile telephony has reached it
zenith is illustrated by the number of subscriber gains during the quarter. According
to CCK, new subscriber gains declined by 59 per cent from 729,343 subscribers
in the first quarter of 2012 to 298,072 in the second quarter. On a year to year
basis, the decline was a staggering 81.2 per cent.
If we share the new addition among all
players, this works out to about 33,219 first time applicant for each company
that quarter. This is a 75 per cent dip compared to the second quarter of the
year 2011. At that timer Mobile operators in Kenya gained, on average, 132,235
new subscribers each month.
With the vertical growth having
reached a plateau, operators in the sector will grow the revenue streams by horizontal
growth that is, introducing products that appeal to their customers.
So far such products are in the
data/internet segment. The regulator
says that internet uptake posted 18.9 per cent growth over that period. This segment is still growing posting some 0.9
million subscribers in the quarter to December 2012, an average of 0.3 million
subscribers a month.
The number of mobile internet/data
subscribers stood at 9.49 million in the quarter to December 2012, an 11.5 per
cent growth over the previous quarter. However the population of users stands
at 14.6 million and growing at 5.6 per cent a quarter. At this rate, it won’t
be long before this segment also hits the plateau.
This leaves mobile money transfer and mobile
banking as the only outstanding sources of revenue growth for these companies.
Mobile money transfer, or M-Pesa in whatever name, has reached 21 million
subscribers, nearly 90 per cent of the adult population in Kenya. It moved some
KES226.7 billion ($2.7billion) in the quarter to December 31, 2012. This is
figure that would drive the local banking sector green with envy. At a growth
rate of 10 per cent q-o-q, this segment is also looks headed for the plateau very
soon.
Mshwari the Mobile banking segment is
the latest addition to the menu of service rendered by the telecoms sector. But
this segment which targets the unbanked Kenyans is facing stiff competition
from the banking sector which has introduced agency banking, also targeting the
same population. However, this one too is headed for the plateau, which leaves
the question what next for the telecoms sector in Kenya?
This is a question that should worry Safaricom,
the largest mobile operator in the eastern Africa region. Safaricom controls 65
per cent of the telecoms sector in Kenya, the largest economy in the region.
Kenya is the second market in Africa
to saturate after South Africa. And the experience of South Africa firms
especially Vodacom is a motivation for Kenyans firms to widen out.
Being the largest player, the story of
the telecoms sector in Kenya is more or less intertwined with the story of
Safaricom. For her the question is what next? Does she continue with business
as usual? Is it time for bare knuckled competition at home? This will not
achieve much for a large segment of the population own more than on Sim cards
and further, the tariffs have declined significantly.
This, it seems, is the time to re-think
strategy for the publicly quoted firm. Safaricom is owned 49 per cent by
Vodafone, 23 per cent by the Government of Kenya and the other 28 per cent is
listed at the Nairobi securities Exchange. This makes it a company under
intense pressure to continue churning out large chunks of profits and pay large
dividends.
Good old poaching of customers does
not look attractive since there are few subscribers to poach anyway. Neither
does repacking the old outfits, introducing new technologies and price wars.
Safaricom, it seems may have to adopt
the MTN model of expanding out of Kenya into perhaps Ethiopia, Somalia, and
South Sudan. She should even take the war to MTN in Uganda and Rwanda. She has
the financial muscle to undertake such a venture and should start now.
So why has she not flexed her muscles? Part of
the reason was that she was consolidating her position at home. Another could
she was cleaning her books having borrowed heavily in the 2000s. It is also possible that has slowed down by
Vodafone’s expansion trajectory in Africa.
Vodafone UK is Safaricom’s part owner.
In the late 1990s she zoned her expansion plans in Africa restricting her
subsidiaries to certain regions.
This is why Vodacom of South Africa, is
confined into the saturated market.
Vodacom is owned 50-50 by Telkom South Africa and Vodafone of UK. It is
not clear whether Safaricom suffers such restriction since Vodafone does not
operate in any other part of eastern Africa. Time for Safaricom to expand in Eastern Africa
is now!
Comments
Post a Comment